As previously stated, TePe USA recently had a collaboration with Dr. Gordon Christensen, who is a prestigious key opinion leader within the odontological field in the U.S. TePe was mentioned in the latest report from January. According to the report, the primary advantages of TePe´s interdental brushes were; the wide variety of sizes, the ergonomic handle, easy to use, soft bristles and efficient cleaning. The report is based on rigorous independent evaluation and testing during the past 12 months.
As a professional, if you would like to help your patients be more successful at home with their interdental cleaning, her is how you GET STARTED.
We are excited to announce that TePe Interdental Bruushes have been chosen "The Best Products for 2018" by the independent Gordon J. Christensen, Clinicians Report!
The report concludes that 87% of 30 CR Evaluators stated they would incorporate TePe Interdental Brushes into their practice. 93% rated them excellent or good and worthy of trial by collegues!
Among the advantages noted were:
Full report to follow.
Finding an upper limit of what might be achievable by patients: oral cleanliness in dental professionals after self-performed manual oral hygiene.
Deinzer R et al.
What can we expect from our patients when it comes to self-performed oral hygiene? To find out what can be considered an upper level, this study assessed the oral cleanliness of dental staff. 127 participants, university dentists, dental students and dental assistants, were included in the study.
Prior to performing an oral hygiene procedure, a clinical examination was conducted including dental status, papillary bleeding index, probing pocket depths, marginal plaque index and a full crown plaque index. The participants were then asked to clean their teeth to the best of their ability using manual devices. Manual toothbrushes, different kinds of toothpaste, and various devices for interdental cleaning were provided.
Afterwards, plaque was measured again. More than 95% of the participants achieved oral cleanliness at 70% or more of their gingival margins and 50% showed oral cleanliness at more than 94% of marginal sections. The time they used to achieve these results varied between 3 and 20 minutes, as the cleaning procedure had no time limit.
The authors conclude that the levels of oral cleanliness achieved in the present study must be considered very high, especially when comparing to results from similar studies performed on laypersons where they scarcely ever reached a marginal plaque index below 50%. According to the authors, 95% of oral cleanliness at gingival margins is the upper limit for what can be expected from our patients, but 70% is probably more realistic.
Knowledge within this field is considered the main factor behind the difference in plaque reduction between professionals and laypersons, indicating that sharing of relevant knowledge is an important intervention to improve patients’ oral health.
As dental professionals, most of the work we do as a matter of routine may be considered insane. For example, we work in a small dark area all day; we are constantly told that patients would rather be other places; and we are members of one of the most feared professions. Nonetheless, Albert Einstein defined insanity as doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. Can this definition be applicable to dentistry? Let’s take a look at five ways we are doing the same thing over and over in dentistry while expecting a different result each time:
By now, it would seem that everyone has heard about the flossing debacle that the Associated Press started, yet so many still haven’t heard the news that not every individual’s teeth would benefit from floss. Dental professionals continue to say: You have to brush two times a day and floss between your teeth. It is a broken record in a majority of dental practices that produces the same result—patients continue not to floss. The time has come to help patients find a way to clean between their teeth and manage their oral health. (1) Stepping away from the monotonous flossing recommendation and suggesting products such as properly sized interdental brushes (figures 1 and 2), oral irrigation or on-the-go solutions (figure 3) that can be easily kept in a pocket or desk drawer would be efficacious of the dental profession. Each patient is different, and the days of asking everyone to floss, knowing that some patients may not be compliant or have the dexterity to perform the task, is insanity. Approaching interdental care in a more pragmatic way by finding a product or combination of products that are easy to use and deliver better results is a great way to break away from the insane practices we ask our patients to do.
Figure 1: Larger grey TePe interdental brush used in an area where previous inflammation has caused attachment loss.
Figure 2: Crown margins and root surface decay are issues for many. Properly sized interdental brushes can clean the surfaces better than flossing alone.
Figure 3: On-the-go options are a great solution for patients to keep handy in their pocket and use throughout the day.
Dental implants are the shiny new toys in the dental professional’s toy box, and they are here to stay. Unfortunately, dental professionals are quick to suggest and place dental implants without properly communicating to patients their responsibility in the implant’s long-term success. This creates a situation ripe for failure. (2) Proper at-home maintenance of a dental implant is vital, but we still hear professionals tell patients to clean it like a natural tooth. The anatomy of a natural tooth is different from that of an implant. Implants may require different products, daily regimens, and more frequent trips to the dentist to ensure success. When looking at a patient’s mouth and how they care—or cared for—their natural dentition should direct the conversation and treatment plan process. Making sure the patient is on board with the proper at-home maintenance regimen is crucial. Placing an implant and thinking it will be more successful in a mouth with poor at-home care is insane.
Dental practices have a tendency to use certain products or limit their take-home products to just a few items, especially the ones that are patient giveaways. Typically, the giveaways that go home in patients’ goody bags are ones that the office received free or got a discount on, without much thought on how they reflect on the practice. Dental professionals tend to put more value on items that the patient typically doesn’t see. For instance, they use the best composite material, the best dental implant system, the best cement for crowns, etc., but place little thought on the products that the patient takes home and associates with the practice. Dental professionals ask patients to trust that they did great work in their mouth, and then ask them to manage that dental work with a toothbrush that they may not actually endorse or one that may not be the best for that patient’s needs. (3,4) Ending a dental appointment that may have gone well with expensive materials used, then sending the patient home with just any home-care tool and asking that patient to believe in the service they received that day is absurd.
These days everyone has an opinion on fluoride. Whether you are for or against the daily application of fluoride, dental professionals need to be armed with other suggestions for those patients who are not interested. Telling a mom whose child is in the chair with multiple cavities that fluoride is the only way is wrong. Fluoride is not the only option these days, and trying to push it on those who are not interested and expecting them to simply change their minds is lunacy. In February 2015, Anne Guignon wrote a great article naming five fluoride-free products that could be suggested to patients who are not interested in fluoride. (5) Give your patients options instead of an argument. The same conversation at each appointment will not deliver results, but meeting patients where they are in their ideologies can.
It is no mystery that patients want only what their insurance will pay for, and that includes the frequency in seeing their dental provider. However, not every patient is meant to maintain their oral health with the standard three- or six-month recall. (4) Allowing patients to come in for their six-month “bloody prophy” and hope that within the next six months something with change and they will become healthy is madness. It can be exasperating to be mindful of the fact that insurance coverage dictates most patients’ decisions while at the same time trying to educate patients about the importance of more frequent dental visits. Dental professionals must not become complacent in their recommendations for dental visit frequency. Tailoring treatment to what each individual needs is key, even if your patient doesn’t agree to it.
Thinking outside of the box and providing a more patient-centered type of treatment will help stop the insanity of the routines of dentistry. If the recommendations that we give patients time and time again are not producing needed results, why continue to give them? Helping patients find the best way to achieve their oral health—on an individual basis—will help redefine the future of dentistry.
1. Chapple IL, Van der Weijden F, Doerfer C et al. Primary prevention of periodontitis: managing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16)S71-76. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12366.
2. Massad JJ, Swati A, Goodacre CJ. Implants and Prosthetic Restorations: Clinical Considerations. Oral Health. http://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/implants-and-prosthetic-restorations-clinical-considerations/. Published July 1, 2015. Accessed February 2, 2017.
3. Schechter B. Selling home care. Dental Economics. 2000;90(8).
4. Bidra AS, Daubert DM, Garcia LT et al. Clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with tooth‐borne and implant‐borne dental restorations. J Prosthod. 2016;25(S1):S32-S40. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12416.
5. Guignon AN. Fluoride-free products that patients will love. RDH Magazine. 2015;35(2).
I like to joke with my patients by saying,
Because dentistry and medicine don’t always cross paths, we can forget that what happens in the body can manifest signs and symptoms in the mouth. Conversely, inflammation in the mouth can exacerbate systemic disease. The dental hygiene profession has based its existence on prevention and education of disease. I feel, at times, we have lost sight of that.
Patients don’t always take us seriously. “I know I should be flossing”, “I don’t have time to floss” ,“Please don’t lecture me on flossing”. How do we help them to see the importance of our recommendations? I have adopted the technique of linking my patient education to a prescription plan. It is my belief, and many others, that what I am teaching them is just as important as a medical procedure or prescription. When I started doing this, patients would often become more engaged. My conversation goes a little like this:
After that, I teach them to use the recommended product and discuss with them any limitations they may have, concerns about their level of compliance, or how I can help motivate them to develop this new habit. It won’t happen overnight, but eventually our patients will see our home care recommendation is as important as a prescription they need to take every day. As a profession, we just have to remember how important patient education is to the long-term success of our patients. If you need help sizing the interdental brushes so you can “prescribe” one to your patient, check out my blog on “Sizing Interdental Brushes”.
"I don't know if you know this, but your mouth is actually connected to your body."
I had a recent discussion with a dentist about building trusting relationships in your practice by ensuring we’re recommending the best for our patients. This means offering the best care, using the best materials, and recommending the best products that are tailored to treat a patient’s unique needs. I then happened to read an article referring to this same concept. Both my discussion and the article similarly concluded that individualized care elevates a patient’s overall success.
I feel like a broken record lately when discussing patient-centered care but it is such an important aspect of our profession. Staying up-to-date on the best cements, composites, and surgical techniques is truly important. And so are our tools for patient education. I have said before, a patient may not come to your office because you offer products like TePe, but once they see that you are recommending quality home-care tools that are tailored to them, they can further trust in the level of care you are delivering in other areas of the practice.
I recently temped in an office that had very basic items in their hygiene closet and recommended outdated practices even though the façade of the practice seemed very progressive. I felt terrible knowing that there are so many more options for each patient’s success, but I wasn’t in a position in which I could help. The experience further reinforced my fight for tailored patient care.
I like to think of it as the “golden-rule”. As a patient, what if you found out you were getting the same one-size-fits-all care as every other individual that walked through the door? Everyone’s story and needs are so very different from the next person. TePe has created products that can be tailored to individuals for more than 50 years. Take a look at the many educational videos to learn how they can be implemented in your practice.
2 August 2016
Following articles published today in various national newspapers, the British Society of Periodontology would like to make the following statement with regard to comments made by the Associated Press in the United States about the ineffectiveness of flossing.
Evidence supports the use of small interdental brushes for cleaning between the teeth, where there is space to do so, in preference to flossing. The recommendation from the 11th European Workshop on the prevention of gum diseases (2015) to patients is : “Daily cleaning between your teeth using special interdental brushes is essential for treating and preventing gum disease. Floss is of little value unless the spaces between your teeth are too tight for the interdental brushes to fit without hurting or causing harm.” Therefore, floss is not a waste of time - it is a viable alternative to interdental brushing where appropriate. Public Health England makes a similar recommendation.
The British Society of Periodontology has just launched a national gum heath awareness campaign (www.bsperio.org.uk/howsyoursmile) in conjunction with Public Health England to raise awareness of the importance of gum health, not just for oral health but to promote good general health. One of the key messages is that daily interdental cleaning is an important health measure to prevent the onset of gum disease. The British Society of Periodontology would be happy to put forward a spokesperson for interview on request.
President, British Society of Periodontology
Dental implants have become a part of everyday dentistry within the U.S. placing upwards of 1 million implants a year. The ability to give patients a viable option for missing teeth is incredible. However, we as clinicians need to make sure that the procedure is going to yield a positive outcome with long-term success. Unfortunately, many dental implants are merely surviving and not considered fully successful. Oftentimes we read studies that will say something like, “these implants have a survival rate of 97%”. That sounds like a positive outcome, doesn’t it? But realistically, surviving doesn’t mean success. But what is the difference between the two?
In order for a dental implant to be considered successful, it has to meet many requirements: be in clinical function, have good esthetics, minimal bone loss radiographically, stable prosthetics, absence of soft-tissue infection, lack any pain, and the patient must be satisfied.
In order for a dental implant to be considered a surviving implant, it simply has to still be present in the mouth. I don’t know about you, but if I have a medical device placed in my body, I hope that it does more than just survives!
So how can we help our patients’ dental implants be successful? Well, here at TePe, we believe the patient’s home care routine is vital to their success. Finding products that align with their level of motivation, capabilities, and also factor in their limitations, is key. TePe has created a variety of products that are easy to use and can be tailored to an individual. I encourage you to watch the educational videos on maintaining dental implants so you can see each product in action. All patients are different and their home care routine will need to be tailored to the individual. Let TePe help your patients have more than just surviving dental implants.
Let’s aim for success!
Check out how to clean dental implants with TePe interdental brushes:
I was just reading an interesting article about compliance. Lack of compliance is one of the biggest enemies we fight in our profession. How do we get our patients to actually perform our recommendations? First, we need to understand why they don’t always comply.
The study outlined in the article, found that half of all patients fail to follow a clinician’s instructions. This is mainly due to one or a combination of the following reasons:
Understanding where our patients’ hesitation stems can help us increase their compliance. Making sure they have all the facts is also important. I never want a patient to come back and say, ‘she never told me’. If anything, I may have put a few on information overload. But I need them to understand what is happening in their mouth and how to make it right. The next time a patient just won’t comply, think about what could be hindering them.
Lee, C. T., Huang, H. Y., Sun, T. C., & Karimbux, N. (2015). Impact of patient compliance on tooth loss during supportive periodontal therapy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dental research, 0022034515578910.